America39s worst cities for dating
America39s worst cities for dating - dating services for singles with liberal views
Gloucester has the lowest number of places to meet people, including the 2nd lowest number of restaurants and the 6th lowest number of coffee shops.
That’s because there aren’t very many options for congregating here, and more than half of the population is already married.
And no, dating a married person isn’t ‘cool.’ It’s actually wrong. 60% married: 3rd highest 42% with kids: 3rd Places to meet: 15th lowest Sure, there are more places to meet up in Franklin than in the cities listed above.
But Franklin has the least number of available single people without kids.
By the way, Boston is on the better side, but came in 30th easiest of 50.
To figure out the best places to find a date in a state, we rely on a complex algorithm that factors in things we generally think make it easy to find single people, and then we figure out which cities have the least number of those things: 52% married: 8th highest 25% with kids: 39th Places to meet: Lowest If you’re trying to get back into the dating scene in Gloucester, you’re gonna have a hard time. 53% of people are already married here, and 1 in 4 people has a kid.
If you live in Massachusetts, you know where we’re talking about.
The cities where the bars are packed, people are out and about, and looking to meet new people.When your parents ask why you’re coming home for the holidays as a single woman or man yet again, direct them to Wallet Hub’s new study, which pinpointed the best and worst cities to date as a single this year. The struggle cities for dating include Yonkers, New York, the worst at No. So if mom and dad aren’t going to help you pay your rent in a city that’s friendly for singles, they need to pipe down already. A team of scientists from the University of Louisville, the University of Michigan and the University of California at Santa Barbara “compared the 150 most populated U. cities based on 25 key metrics.” Their data ranged from the percentages of singles in a city, the online dating opportunities, to the average costs for dining, going out for drinks, going to the movies, rent, the highest and lowest gender balance and more.“In order to identify the best cities for singles, Wallet Hub’s analysts compared the 150 most populated U. cities across two equally weighted dimensions, ‘Dating Economics’ and ‘Romance & Fun.'”So what did they find? Well, the best city to be a single dating is Salt Lake City, Utah. Other top-finishing cities include Atlanta, Georgia at No. 1 for “Romance & Fun” interestingly), Austin, Texas at No. A whopping 60% of people in Franklin already has a snuggle bunny, and they don’t want a third, thank you very much.